“It was goosebumps for me,” says Sikhulile Moyo, laboratory director at the Botswana-Harvard Aids Institute Partnership in Gaborone. On November 19, Moyo observed “certain patterns of mutations that we’ve never seen” in four samples among 95 Covid-positive swabs randomly selected for genome sequencing.

“We saw something very strange,” says Moyo. Puzzled by the set of mutations, he double and triple checked the tests for contamination and to ensure they had captured more than 95 per cent of the viral genetic code — the benchmark of a good sequence.

Scientists in South Africa and Hong Kong were puzzling over the same perplexing constellation of genetic changes detected in their labs — far more than in any previous variant of Sars-Cov-2.

After alerting Botswana’s minister of health on November 23, Moyo uploaded data about the variant to Gisaid, the global repository of viral genomes. “We really didn’t imagine the impact,” he says. “We saw the next day that South Africa had seen the same thing and Hong Kong too. We chatted and we realised . . . these mutations were in a class of their own.”

Meanwhile, South African epidemiologists were becoming alarmed by a rapid rise in Covid cases in Gauteng province, including in Johannesburg and Pretoria. They immediately linked this sudden surge to the appearance of a hyper-mutated new variant, which scientists called B.1.1.529 and the World Health Organization then named Omicron.

Jeremy Kamil, a virologist studying Sars-Cov-2 evolution at Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, describes his shock when its genome was released. “It was like coming home from vacation and seeing that someone hasn’t just planted a few flowers in your garden. They’ve remodelled the whole landscape,” he says.

Labs around the world are scrambling to answer three fundamental questions: Is Omicron more transmissible than previous variants? Can it evade the immunity conferred by previous Sars-Cov-2 infection or vaccination? And does it cause more severe disease?

Peter Openshaw, a professor of medicine at Imperial College London, says preliminary evidence suggests the answers to the first two questions are, “Yes, but no one knows to what extent”. Though Omicron seems to transmit faster than previous variants in South Africa, it is less clear that it can outcompete Delta across the world.

Soumya Swaminathan, the WHO’s chief scientist, says it is ‘premature to draw any conclusions about the efficacy of vaccines against Omicron’
Soumya Swaminathan, the WHO’s chief scientist, says it is ‘premature to draw any conclusions about the efficacy of vaccines against Omicron’ © Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images

As for symptoms, “there’s just not enough information about how severe Omicron is”, he adds. “My assumption is that for now we treat it as if it is about as severe as Delta.”

The medical and scientific world responded to news of B.1.1.529 far more quickly than to any previous coronavirus variant. Just three days after learning of its existence, on November 26, the WHO designated it a Variant of Concern — the fifth after Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Delta.

Although scientists have been working on Omicron for little more than a week, the public and policymakers are desperate for information — which can lead to the overinterpretation of anecdotal evidence and small scraps of data.

Ran Balicer, head of Israel’s national Covid advisory committee, says he had “no clue” where early estimates of Covid vaccine efficacy, published in Israeli media this week, had come from. “We will experience in the coming week or two . . . an abundance of opinions, disparate pieces of data and additional inferences by many people . . . and I would suggest everyone just holds tight and wait,” he says.

Early evidence of vaccine efficacy against Omicron will come within days from “virus neutralisation tests”, says Paul Hunter, professor of medicine at the University of East Anglia. “Essentially you grow the virus in a tissue culture and then see whether you can stop it growing with blood from people who have been vaccinated.”

Chart indicating that research from South Africa shows people are more likely to be reinfected with the Omicron variant than others before it, a sign of immune evasion. Over more than a year in South Africa before the Omicron variant appeared, people who had previously recovered from Covid had only around 10-15% as much chance of being newly infected as those who had not previously been infected, suggesting that prior infection conveyed 85-90% protection. In the short period since Omicron emerged, the relative reinfection risk has climbed to 25%, suggesting the new variant’s mutations allow it to evade some antibodies.

At the same time epidemiologists will be searching for evidence by comparing rates of infection and serious illness caused by Omicron in vaccinated and unvaccinated people of similar age and demography. The UK Health Security Agency expects to release preliminary findings very soon.

A bad sign came from a study released by South African scientists on Thursday, showing that Omicron was much more likely than Delta to reinfect people who had earlier been infected with the Beta variant. They concluded that Omicron’s “advantage is at least partially driven by an increased ability to infect previously infected individuals”. (This research has not been peer reviewed.)

While waiting for firm data, vaccine developers have been issuing informed opinions — with differing emphasis. Moderna said Omicron would cause a “material” drop in efficacy, while Oxford and BioNTech signalled that the vaccines could continue to work well against severe disease.

Such statements got short shrift from the WHO. Soumya Swaminathan, the health body’s chief scientist, says it would be “premature to draw any conclusions about the efficacy of vaccines against Omicron”. 

Chart showing that Covid cases and hospital admissions are rising faster than during previous waves in South Africa’s Tshwane district, where Omicron is most prevalent

Research would take “a few weeks”, she says. “We need to be patient” while waiting for “clinical effectiveness studies to truly understand if this variant is able to overcome the immunity generated by existing vaccines”.

Antibodies vs mutations

The human immune system relies on both antibodies (protein molecules) and T-cells (white blood cells) to fight infection. Looking at Omicron’s extensive set of mutations — about 50 altogether, including more than 30 in the spike protein that binds to human cells — “the bets are on this being quite resistant in terms of antibodies, but we don’t know yet how much T-cell immunity will attenuate or shorten disease”, says Openshaw.

“I think there’s good reason to believe that the T-cell immunity will continue to hold,” says Penny Moore, a virologist at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg. “T-cells target many more regions on the spike than the antibodies — while mutations can knock off antibodies more easily.”

A woman in Soweto, South Africa walks in front of a graffiti art work educating local residents about the dangers of coronavirus
Soweto: Though Omicron seems to transmit faster than previous variants in South Africa, it is less clear that it can outcompete Delta across the world © Kim Ludbrook/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

The most recent data show that booster jabs enhance immune protection substantially against other Covid variants in people who have already been doubly vaccinated. Scientists expect them to do the same for Omicron, prompting wealthy western countries such as the US and UK to offer third doses to all adults. But WHO officials say the priority should be to vaccinate everyone in the world, rather than giving boosters to healthy young adults in rich nations.

Among the drugs that have been designed to treat Covid, one category uses antibodies aimed at specific targets on the virus. Scientists expect the antibody treatments made by Regeneron and Eli Lilly to lose efficacy when faced with Omicron because their target — the spike protein — has changed, however early tests suggest that GSK’s antibody sotrovimab will be better able to tackle the new variant.

GSK and its partner Vir Biotechnology chose to base sotrovimab on an antibody derived from a survivor of the Sars outbreak in 2003, caused by Sars-CoV-1, because they thought if it could tackle both coronaviruses, it was more likely to be effective against future variants.

“What you are looking for is a part of the virus that doesn’t change much in subspecies,” says Amanda Peppercorn, medicine development leader for GSK’s Covid antibody programme. Most antibody treatments target an area at the top of the spike protein, near where it binds with the human’s ACE2 receptor to enter a cell, but GSK’s drug hooks into the side of the spike.

A woman walks past a ‘wear a mask’ sign outside a pop-up vaccination centre for the Covid-19 vaccine in London
London: The emergence of Omicron has prompted wealthy western countries such as the US and UK to offer third ‘booster’ vaccine doses to all adults © Daniel Leal/AFP via Getty Images

Another drug type — antiviral pills made by Pfizer and Merck of the US — is expected to work just as well against Omicron because, unlike the antibodies, these treatments disrupt enzymes that all coronaviruses need to replicate.

When it comes to transmission, the speed with which Covid cases are surging in South Africa — faster than the first three waves caused by the original Sars-Cov-2 strain, Beta and Delta — suggests that Omicron is indeed more infectious than other variants. The country confirmed more than 11,500 new cases on Thursday, a sharp increase from the hundreds of daily infections being recorded just weeks ago. Testing confirms that Omicron is driving South Africa’s fourth wave.

Elsewhere in the world, reports of Omicron are increasing fast. Most cases so far have a history of travel to southern Africa, though there is community and household transmission too. The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control said on Thursday there had been 352 confirmed cases in 27 countries. Mathematical modelling by ECDC, based on very provisional estimates, suggests that Omicron will account for more than half of all Europe’s Sars-Cov-2 infections within the next few months.

Sikhulile Moyo, laboratory director at the Botswana-Harvard Aids Institute Partnership in Gaborone
Sikhulile Moyo, laboratory director at the Botswana-Harvard Aids Institute Partnership in Gaborone, who alerted Botswana’s minister of health over mutations in samples © Sikhulile Moyo

Initial reports from South Africa about the severity of the disease were mildly encouraging, with the vast majority of cases showing few or no symptoms. But the country’s health ministry told a briefing on Friday that hospitalisations are now increasing rapidly in Gauteng, with “a particularly sharp rise” in admissions of children under five years old.

The psychological toll of not knowing

Waiting for more to be known about the Omicron variant is itself taking a psychological toll, compounding the stresses of the past 20 months, some experts believe.

Kate Sweeny, a professor of psychology at the University of California, Riverside, says uncertainty is psychologically challenging under nearly all circumstances. “If you consider how humans came to be the way we are, not knowing what’s coming in the future is dangerous for survival, so it makes sense that we would have developed an aversion to that state so we’d be motivated to resolve uncertainty whenever possible,” she says.

Stress from this sort of worry could affect wellbeing through “elevated levels of anxiety and depression, as well as disrupted sleep, less healthy behaviour, and general wear and tear on our physical health”, she adds.

Graphic showing the key mutations that shape the Omicron variant

 “The fact that we keep having our attention drawn to Covid and new variants — and the constancy of all the uncertainty surrounding it — is bound to be negative and harmful for us both physiologically and psychologically,” agrees Paul Dolan, a professor of behavioural science at the London School of Economics.

But Hunter urges people not to fall into excessively gloomy moods, despite all the unknowns. “Most credible people who understand virology say that Omicron is not going to bring Armageddon,” he says. “Most of us would be very surprised if Covid became nearly as bad as it was last January. I still believe we have lived through the worst months of this pandemic.”

Additional reporting by Donato Paolo Mancini, Sarah Neville and Hannah Kuchler

Get alerts on Coronavirus pandemic when a new story is published

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2021. All rights reserved.
Reuse this content (opens in new window) CommentsJump to comments section